Search ▸ Agenda item attachment
A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-37, regarding renaming the Central Square Library
⚠ This document is a scan; its text was recovered by optical character recognition and may contain errors. The original PDF is authoritative.
Assistant City Solicitors
Nancy E. Glowa
Paul S. Kawai
City Solicitor
Keplin K. U. Allwaters
STEVIS DE
Arthur J. Goldberg
Sean M. McKendry
Brian A. Schwartz
Deputy City Solicitor
Diane O. Pires
Megan B. Bayer
First Assistant City Solicitor
Public Records Access Officer
Seah Levy
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE
Office of the City Solicitor
795 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
June 21, 2021
Louis A. DePasquale
City Manager
Cambridge City Hall
795 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re:
Response to Council Order No. 0-6 of 7/27/20 Re: Formally Renaming the
Central Square Library in Honor of Maria Baldwin and Rep. John Lewis, With
the Building Being Known as "The Maria Baldwin and Rep. John Lewis
Library and Center for African American/Black History and Culture"
Dear Mr. DePasquale:
We have prepared this legal opinion in response to Council Order No. O-6 of 7/27/20,
which requests that the City Manager be and hereby is requested to consult with the Director of
the Cambridge Public Library, the Library Board of Trustees, and any other appropriate City
personnel to consider formally renaming the Central Square Library in honor of Maria Baldwin
and Rep. John Lewis, with the building being known as "The Maria Baldwin and Rep. John
Lewis Library and Center for African American/Black History and Culture" going forward, or to
otherwise find another suitable location for this dedication. This legal opinion addresses who
has authority to rename a City building, and specifically the Central Square Library. Pursuant to
the Plan "E" Charter, the City Manager is authorized to rename a City building.
In November 1940, the City adopted the current Plan "E" form of government, which
includes the following sections that establish the statutory authority of the City Manager's
exercise of his authority over the City's buildings and over the operations of the Public Library
Department.
M.G.L. c. 43, § 103, provides:
The city council shall appoint a city manager who shall be sworn to the faithful
performance of his duties and who shall be the chief administrative officer of the city and
Telephone [phone removed]
Facsimile [phone removed]
TTY/TTD [phone removed]
shall be responsible for the administration of all departments, commissions, boards and
officers of the city, whether established before its adoption of this plan or thereafter,
except that of the city clerk, city auditor, any official appointed by the governor or any
body elected by the voters of the city....(Emphasis supplied).
M.G.L. c. 43, § 104, provides:
It shall be the duty of the city manager ... to supervise the administration of the affairs of
the city ....(Emphasis supplied).
The City's 1940 adoption of the Plan "E" charter is consistent with the trend in municipal
government to centralize power and authority over municipal departments. The Massachusetts
Supreme Judicial Court ("SJC) held in Williams v. City Manager of Haverhill, 330 Mass. 14
(1953)
It is not unusual in accordance with the present trend in municipal government to
centralize power and responsibility for the proper and faithful conduct of
municipal officers and departments upon a mayor and more recently upon a city
manager. That trend is exemplified in the Plan D form of city charter. The city
manager is by § 89' of the charter designated the chief administrative officer of
the city and is responsible for the administration of all departments, commissions,
boards, and offices of the city, whether established before its adoption of this plan
or thereafter, except that of the city clerk, city auditor any official appointed by
the Governor, or anybody elected by the voters of the city. Id. at 15-16.
After concluding that the charter vested authority in the Haverhill City Manager, the SJC
further ruled:
This interpretation of the new charter is in harmony with one of its main
purposes to concentrate broad and extensive authority in a city manager in order
to acquire and maintain a high degree of efficiency in the administration of
municipal affairs. Id. at 18.
See also Atkinson v. Town of Ipswich, 34 Mass. App. Ct. 663, 666 (1993) ("purpose is to
concentrate administrative authority and responsibility in a professional manager, to the end of
efficient and economic administration of municipal affairs.").
Consistent with this trend identified by the Supreme Judicial Court, the City Manager is
responsible for administration of all departments and the affairs of the City. The responsibility
for administration of all departments and affairs of the City has been interpreted broadly.
Accordingly, this includes responsibility for City buildings, and in our opinion and in the
absence of any statute to the contrary, the authority to name City buildings.
In 1880, sixty years prior to the adoption of the Plan "E" Charter, the City enacted the
Cambridge Public Library Ordinance, later amended to be named the Public Library Department
' This provision of the Plan "D" charter is identical to § 103 of the City's Plan "E" charter.
2
Ordinance and codified at Chapter 2.46 of the Municipal Code (the "Ordinance"). The
Ordinance vests the care, custody and maintenance of the library buildings with the Board of
Trustees. However, the later adopted Plan "E" Charter supersedes the conflicting provisions in
the Ordinance. M.G.L. c. 43, § 4, provides:
Ordinances, resolutions, orders or other regulations of a city or of any authorized
body or official thereof, existing at the time when such city adopts a plan of
government set forth in this chapter, shall continue in full force and effect until
repealed, modified or superseded. (Emphasis supplied).
Therefore, the provision in the Ordinance vesting the care, custody and maintenance of the
library buildings with the Board of Trustees are superseded, but any other provisions of the
Ordinance that are not in conflict with the Plan "E" Charter are not superseded, such as the other
powers and duties of the Board of Trustees.
By virtue of the operation of M.G.L. c. 43, §§ 4, 103 and 104 and Massachusetts cases,
the City Manager is vested with the authority over City buildings, including library buildings,
and such authority encompasses the authority to name or rename a library building.
Very truly yours,
Nancy E/Glowa
City Solicitor