Search ▸ Agenda item attachment
A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a Planning Board report with no positive or negative recommendation on the Kelley et. al. Zoning Petition
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
P L A N N I N G B O A R D
CITY HALL ANNEX, 344 BROADWAY, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139
Page 1 of 2
Date:
April 24, 2023
Subject:
Craig Kelley et. al. Zoning Petition
Recommendation:
The Planning Board makes the following report with no positive or
negative recommendation.
To the Honorable, the City Council,
On April 11, 2023, the Planning Board (the “Board”) held a public hearing to discuss a Zoning
Petition by Craig Kelley, et. al. (the “Proponent”), to amend Article 4.000 of the Cambridge
Zoning Ordinance to establish new use categories for “Shared Vehicle” and “Publicly-accessible,
Privately-owned Electric Vehicle Charging System,” both of which would be permitted by-right
in all zoning districts except for Open Space districts. In addition, the Petition proposes to
amend Section 6.20 Off Street Parking Regulations by inserting a new Section 6.21(a) which
states that “Electric Vehicle Charging Systems may be installed in any parking space conforming
to the dimensional and other requirements of Article 6.000, or if not, are lawfully non-
conforming.”
The Board heard a presentation from Craig Kelley and received written materials prior to the
hearing from staff in the City’s Community Development Department (CDD). Following the
presentation, public comment, and discussion among Board members, the Planning Board voted
to forward this report to the City Council without making a positive or negative
recommendation.
Board members supported the overall goal of the Petition to promote the expansion of both
electric vehicle and shared vehicle use in order to achieve the City’s goals of reducing
greenhouse gas emissions and agreed that there is a shortage of electric vehicle charging
infrastructure available for public use. Some Board members believed that access to vehicles is
an equity issue, and finding ways of making vehicles accessible without the need for automobile
ownership can increase mobility and access for underserved populations. Further, in order to
achieve the City’s mobility and climate goals, the Board expressed strong support for the City to
study a possible policy framework that could include strategies like the activities described in the
Proponent’s Petition. The Board acknowledged the ongoing planning studies on these topics
being undertaken by the City and felt that these studies will assist in formalizing
recommendations on possible regulatory changes to accommodate these types of strategies.
The Board did not reach consensus as to whether the Petition, and zoning more broadly, is the
appropriate mechanism to achieve the intended policy goals. Board members acknowledged that
zoning is just one aspect of a broader planning and policy strategy to address the issues that the
City of Cambridge, MA • Planning Board Report
Craig Kelley et. al. Zoning Petition
April 24, 2023
Page 2 of 2
Petition discusses. Board members also expressed concern that there could be unintended
consequences of both aspects of the Petition, particularly regarding the potential for increased
traffic in residential neighborhoods and the availability of on-street parking. Board members
raised questions about the potential ramifications of including specific vehicle types as land use
categories in zoning, which is intended to regulate real property like land and buildings. More
broadly, some Board members believed that the City’s overall approach and focus on increasing
EV infrastructure should occur in commercial and industrial zoning districts, rather than
prioritizing changes in residential areas.
The Planning Board voted with six members in favor of transmitting the above report. Two
members were absent.
Respectfully submitted for the Planning Board,
Mary Flynn, Chair.