Search ▸ Agenda item attachment
A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report #23-39, regarding the legal opinion for issuing bonds for affordable housing
⚠ This document is a scan; its text was recovered by optical character recognition and may contain errors. The original PDF is authoritative.
Nancy E. Glowa
Assistant City Solicitors
City Solicitor
Paul S. Kawai
Sean M. McKendry
Diane O. Pires
Megan B. Bayer
COR
Deputy City Solicitor
Kate M. Kleimola
Sydney M. Wright
Elliott J. Veloso
Evan C. Bjorklund
First Assistant City Solicitor
Franziskus Lepionka
Andrea Carrillo-Rhoads
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE
Public Records Access Officer
Office of the City Solicitor
795 Massachusetts Avenue
Seah Levy
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
June 26, 2023
Yi-An Huang
City Manager
City Hall
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: Awaiting Report No. 21-31; Order No. O-8 of 5/22/23 Re: Request that the City
Manager work with the Law Department to provide a legal opinion on whether the City
could fund affordable housing construction through a bond issue
Dear Mr. Huang:
This is in response to Awaiting Report No. 21-31; Order No. O-8 of 5/22/23, which
requests that the City Manager work with the Law Department to develop a legal opinion on
whether the City of Cambridge ("City") could fund affordable housing construction through a
bond issue.
We have asked the City's bond counsel at Locke, Lord LLP (the "Firm") to provide a
legal opinion on the question asked by the Council in this order. The Firm opined as follows:
1. In Massachusetts, cities and towns have specific authority to issue bonds for the purpose
of affordable housing under the two Massachusetts General Law statutes shown below.
There is no general authority to borrow for such purpose under Chapter 44.
• Chapter 44B Community Preservation
• Chapter 121B Housing and Urban Development
2. As a threshold matter, there is settled Massachusetts case law establishing rules of
statutory construction, or analysis governing the interpretation of statutory authority. The
general rule is that specific statutory authority controls over general statutory authority.
For example, in Commonwealth v. Houston, 430 Mass. 616, 722 N.E.2d. 942 (2000):
.... However, to the extent a conflict between the two statutes exists, "the more
specific statute controls over the more general one." See 2B Singer, Sutherland
Statutory Construction § 51.02 (5th ed. 1992)."
If the City were to issue bonds for the purpose of affordable housing pursuant to the
Community Preservation Act ("CPA"), any projects financed by the proceeds of such bonds
would be subject to certain limitations contained in the CPA, Chapter 44B of the Massachusetts
General Laws. For instance, in Chapter 44B, there are restrictions with respect to the percentage
Telephone [phone removed]
Facsimile [phone removed]
T1Y/TTD [phone removed]
of funds to be spent on different initiatives, and the use of funds may be subject to the
recommendations and directives of the City's Community Preservation Act Committee.
While Chapter 121B of the Massachusetts General Laws provides authority more broadly to
borrow for the purpose of affordable housing, that statute provides authority only for a housing
or redevelopment authority to borrow for the purpose of affordable housing and is not directly
available to the City.
Therefore, given that there is no general statutory authority to borrow for the purpose of
affordable housing, if the City wishes to borrow for such purpose and does not want to do so
under the specific statutory authority available under Chapter 44B, the City would be required to
seek special legislation.
Very Truly Yours,
XXX
Nancy E. Glowa
City Solicitor
2