Search â–¸ Agenda item attachment
A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a summary of a Planning Board Meeting on the 2024 Town Gown Reports and Presentations
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
P L A N N I N G B O A R D
CITY HALL ANNEX, 344 BROADWAY, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139
Page 1 of 2
Date:
March 4, 2025
Subject:
2024 Town-Gown Reports and Presentations
To the Honorable, the City Council,
On February 4, 2025, the Cambridge Planning Board met to hear the annual Town-Gown
presentations from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lesley University, Hult
International Business School, and Harvard University. Each of these schools had submitted a
2024 Town-Gown report, which were reviewed by the Planning Board and made available to the
public.
The Town-Gown reporting process provides information about the educational missions of the
universities, their current and future programs, and development plans for the physical campus.
The presentations and reports cover topics such as enrollment and staffing, housing, facilities
needs, sustainability and resilience, connections with the broader community, and efforts around
diversity, equity, and inclusion. This knowledge gives the Planning Board a better understanding
of how individual projects fit into an institution’s broader plans.
After the institutions’ presentations and public comment, Planning Board members made
observations about the information provided. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Planning
Board voted to send the following summary of Board comments to the City Council:
• Planning Board members again showed appreciation to the institutions for their
participation in the process, which is helpful in providing context by describing the broad
range of campus activities and development that do not come to the Planning Board for
individual approval.
• Board members appreciated the thoroughness of the institutions’ reports, which provided
information that was requested in past Town-Gown discussions, including campus
sustainability efforts, spaces that are open to the public, the urban forest, transportation,
and engagement with public school students in Cambridge.
• Board members responded positively to the additional focus on collaborations among the
institutions and the City, particularly around climate mitigation and purchasing of local
goods and services.
• Housing remains an issue that the Board agreed deserves continued attention. Board
members commended universities’ efforts to increase their on-campus housing,
particularly noting MIT’s very recently fulfilled commitment to create substantial new
City of Cambridge, MA • Planning Board Report
2024 Town-Gown Reports and Presentations
March 4, 2025
Page 2 of 2
graduate student beds. Board members still expressed concern about long-term trends
showing increased pressure from students and affiliates on the off-campus housing
market. There was an interest in continuing to gather more information on this topic,
including housing costs and affordability (both on-campus and off-campus) and how
trends in Cambridge compare to other local communities that are home to major
universities. There was also interest in seeing if there is a better way to represent the data
to make the issues clearer.
• Environmental issues were a strong part of many institutions’ reports and presentations.
MIT was commended for identifying and publicizing cool spots on campus. In addition to
all institutions providing tree canopy information, Lesley was commended for including
information about campus permeable area, which other institutions were asked to
emulate. Board members asked if more specific data about greenhouse gas emissions
could be provided in the future.
• Lesley in particular was noted for following through on its plans to reduce its land
holdings in Cambridge, and was commended for making many of its sites available for
future City-supported affordable housing development.
• It was noted that MIT mentioned artificial intelligence in their presentation, which Board
members were intrigued to hear more about and what it might mean for Cambridge.
• Finally, Board members noted that on the whole, the upside of having these institutions in
Cambridge far outweigh the downsides created by any negative impacts. Nevertheless, it
is important to discuss issues of concern to the community, and Board members
encouraged the institutions to focus not just on their positive contributions but on
improvements that could be made in the future.
Respectfully submitted for the Planning Board,
Mary Flynn, Chair.