Search ▸ Communication to the City Council
Letter from Councillor Nolan transmitting a report on the Cambridge Zero Emission Transportation Plan. PLACED ON THE TABLE IN COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 15, 2025
CAMBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL
Patricia Nolan
City Councillor
Re: Cambridge Zero Emission Transportation Plan
Dear Colleagues:
I am glad that the first ever Zero Emission Transportation Plan (ZETP), formerly known as the Net
Zero Transportation Plan (NZTP), is on the agenda. Thank you to the dedicated City staff in both the
Department of Transportation as well as the Sustainability Department and Community Development
Department who spent many months discussing these ideas with stakeholders, experts, an advisory
group, and the Health and Environment Committee. For the City Council to adopt this plan as one of
our major planning documents, similar to the Net Zero Action Plan, the Zero Waste Master Plan, and
the Urban Forest Master Plan, it is important that City Council goals and recent actions on this issue
taken by the council since the working group finished their discussions are included in the document.
Two specific additions are noted below that reflect Council priorities and goals related to long-term
transportation planning.
The Health and Environment Committee met with the ZETP team on February 24, 2025 to review an
early draft of the plan. As part of that meeting, the committee requested that the chair work with City
staff to update the draft to include the comments from the meeting. After the meeting, I worked to
ensure that SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timebound) goals were added, to
enable better monitoring of important goals year-to-year in advance of the overall goal of net zero
transportation emissions by 2050. As a result of that joint work, the updated draft plan incorporates
eleven SMART goals, outlined in the final document, to track travel mode, improvements to access to
public transportation and Bluebikes, and metrics for car-travel and EV adoption. These targets will
allow for better oversight and tracking and will allow staff to make informed changes to strategies
over time. These goals were developed through informed discussions among City staff with the ZETP
advisory group, outreach to the community, the Health and Environment Committee, and through an
examination of worldwide and national trends.
In addition to the goals and initiatives already within the document, this City Council has long
focused on expanding bus and shuttle access citywide, through either fare free programs in
conjunction with the MBTA and/or through municipal services to supplement MBTA work and
CITY HALL, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139
Email: pnolan@cambridgema.gov
improved coordination with private shuttles. The Transportation and Public Utilities Committee and
the Neighborhood and Long Term Planning Committee met on June 18, 2025 to help define the scope
of an ongoing Citywide Shuttle and Transit Gap Study. That study and the underlying goals should be
reflected in this document under the “Buses and Shuttles” section. Under BAS-3, an additional bullet
should be added: “City staff will continue to work with the City Council and private shuttle providers
to explore options for a municipal transit pilot program informed by the Citywide Shuttle and Transit
Gap Study.” Additionally, the BAS section should indicate efforts to expand fare free programs. The
“Reducing Car Trips” section of the document indicates work on helping residents with financial
support for bus/train fare (RCT-2) and work on helping with seamless fare transfers (RCT-4), but does
not reference previous and ongoing work on fare-free transit options, including the Fare-Free Bus
Pilot Working Group, the work on the MBTA Route 1 bus, and the work of the EZRide shuttle bus
service. BAS-3 should add a bullet (or a section, BAS-4) to indicate ongoing work to expand
fare-free transit options, such as: “Participate in State and regional discussions about expansion of
fare-free transit and consider municipal subsidies to add to fare-free options for residents.”
Similarly, improving safety and access for micromobility modes has been an important transportation
initiative of this Council as well as City staff. POR 2025 #122 referenced some of this work including
a Transportation and Public Utilities Committee meeting on June 25, 2024 that sought to clarify the
regulatory landscape of various micromobility options. City staff have participated in state-level
planning for a changing micromobility landscape and have continued to work to clarify safety rules
and expand options for micromobility options which can help reduce single-occupancy vehicle travel,
especially for short trips, as well as provide alternative mobility for elderly residents and disabled
residents. The ongoing work to both understand changing micromobility options and expand adoption
should be referenced in this document under the “Walk, Bike and Micromobility” section. The
footnote in this section underscores the importance of clear rules and guidance for micromobility
devices, but the plan should be clearer about the proactive role that the City has taken to push forward
these discussions at the state level. Language should be added to the introduction of the “Walk, Bike
and Micromobility” section to indicate that work, such as: “City staff have participated in state-level
planning for a changing micromobility landscape and will continue to work to clarify safety rules and
expand options for micromobility options, which can help reduce single-occupancy vehicle travel,
especially for short trips, as well as provide alternative mobility for elderly residents and disabled
residents.”
Thank you to City staff, the advisory group, the community and the City Council for working to
refine and improve this plan over the last several years and in working together to address climate
change through a changing mobility landscape.
Sincerely,
Patricia Nolan
Chair, Health and Environment Committee
2