🏛 The Cambridge Record
Search ▸ Communication to the City Council

a communication from Vice Mayor Devereux regarding City Ordinance 2.110.010 entitled Disposition of City Property as it relates to the First Street garage

From City Clerk Donna P. Lopez·Council meeting Nov 19, 2018·3 pages·📄 Original PDF (city portal)

⚠ This document is a scan; its text was recovered by optical character recognition and may contain errors. The original PDF is authoritative.

CAMBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL Jan Devereux Vice Mayor DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2018 TO: CITY CLERK DONNA P. LOPEZ FROM: VICE MAYOR JAN DEVEREUX SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL COMMUNICATION AND REPORT FROM OTHER CITY OFFICERS Please place the attached information on Communications and Reports from Other City Officer list for the City Council meeting tonight. This information is in reference to Charter Right #1 on the First Street Garage and relates to questions on the Municipal Code Ordinance 2.110.010 entitled Disposition of City Property. Thank you. CITY HALL, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139 [phone removed] FAX [phone removed] TTY/TDD: [phone removed] EMAIL: jdevereux@cambridgema.gov
2.110.010 - Disposition of city property. This chapter shall apply to the sale, transfer, lease or rental, or exchange of any city-owned property or property rights or interest such as a public easement on private property, collectively called "Disposition of City Property."20This chapter shall not apply to the transfer of real estate, or any interest therein, to the Affordable Housing Trust for the purposes of construction of low- and moderate-income housing pursuant to M.G.L. c. 40, s. 15A. The purpose of this chapter is to protect the citizens of Cambridge and to achieve land uses that best serve the City's public purpose. Have any other land uses been considered beyond leasing a portion of the parking and retail for 30 years? In addition, when the public purpose is found to be best served by a disposition of City property for a private purpose, the City's objective will be to receive the fair market value for such property, to protect real estate values, and to dispose of each property without favoritism. The RFP seems aimed solely to meet one party's need for parking to accommodate a development on another site. No disposition of City property shall be completed unless the above criteria have been satisfied, all requirements of applicable State law have been met, and the following process has taken place: A. The City Manager shall be responsible for engaging in a process that will result in a fair analysis of how the greatest public benefit can be obtained from the City property in question. A study of merely parking will not accomplish this. B. The City Manager shall prepare a report. The report shall be based on careful consideration of the issues enumerated below. In the course of preparing the report, at least one community meeting shall be held to discuss the issues and community concerns and they shall be addressed in the report. Advance notice of such meetings shall be given to potentially affected persons describing the proposals under consideration. The report shall include the following information: 1. A description and analysis of the alternative uses for the City property, including an analysis of public benefits and drawbacks and the financial impact of each alternative; A study of merely parking will not accomplish this. 2. The use of the City property at the time of the recommended disposition and any actual or projected annual revenues or costs associated with such property; 3. The existing zoning status of the property and other City, State, and federal laws, codes, ordinances and regulations that apply to it at the time of the recommended disposition and that would apply to the various alternative uses analyzed; The City is not currently planning to study alternatives. 4. Any attempts to reone the property or to change existing laws, codes, ordinances or regulations or uses with regard to the property that have taken place within the previous five years; 5. The development potential of the property; The City is not currently planning to study this. 6. A full description of development plans proposed for the site, including traffic and parking studies and other appropriate analyses of the impact on the neighboring area and the City as a whole; A study of merely parking will not accomplish this. 7. A review of the financial arrangements being recommended, including two independently prepared impartial appraisals of such property's worth that contain an independent, good faith estimate of such property's worth to the prospective buyer, transferee, or lessee. This should include the financial arrangements of alternative uses for the property.
C. The City Manager shall submit the report to the Planning Board and to the City Council and City Clerk for public dissemination. The Planning Board shall hold a public hearing not sooner than two weeks after receipt of the report, and after study, shall submit its recommendation to the City Manager for submission to the City Council. D. The City Council shail hold a public hearing within six weeks of receipt of the City Manager's recommendation and the Planning Board report. E. At least fourteen days prior to the public hearings by the Planning Board and the City Council, the ulty clerk shall post notice of the hearings at various conspicuous locations upon the City property giving the purpose of the hearing in detail, and shall send this written notice to the owners of property and renters, listed on the annual street list or on the assessor's records, within three hundred feet of the City property. The City Clerk shall notify civic groups and neighborhood associations who may be affected by or interested in such disposition of City property and shall publish notice of said hearings in newspapers of general circulation within Cambridge at least fourteen days prior to the date of each said hearing. F. The disposition of City property shall require a 2/3 vote of the City Council. G. For the disposition of city property that is of such little significance that the above described process would be unduly burdensome, the City Manager may request of the City Council a diminution of this process. Approval of such a request shall require a 2/3 vote of the City Council. (Ord. 1105, 1990)