Search ▸ Communication to the City Council
a report from Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair of the Public Safety Committee, for a public hearing held on December 5, 2018 to explore the legal options Cambridge does and does not have when permitting existing, new and emerging mobility platforms in Cambridge
⚠ This document is a scan; its text was recovered by optical character recognition and may contain errors. The original PDF is authoritative.
Gutierrez, Mark
AtTAChmEnTA
Kelley, Craig
From:
Sent:
Monday, December 3, 2018 10:21 PM
DePasquale, Louie
To:
Gutierrez, Mark
Cc:
Subject:
Questions for Wednesday's New Mobility Permitting meeting
Hey Louie:
At Wednesday's meeting on permitting of new mobility platform, the general goal is to get an understanding of the
City's thinking about how we're going to fit this new stuff into existing permitting programs or what new sorts of permits
we might need. And, if we need new permits, do we also need some sort of special authority from the state to get what
we want or do we have absolute authority.
I think we've only just begun the journey to a new urban mobility and whether it's Bonzer or Bird or Lime or Blue Bike or
who knows what, they're going to present ongoing new challenges for how we use public space and we've really got to
be focused on how we'll adapt to these new transportation options, to include how they might be permitted.
In particular, 1 am hoping to learn more about:
1. The ability of businesses to get on-street parking stickers in Cambridge.
a. Do they simply need a mailing address? A post office box? Just pay excise tax?
b. Is there a limit to how many stickers any one business can get?
c. Are they the same as traditional on-street stickers?
2. Can we modify our contract with Blue Bikes to allow bike share competition?
Can we cancel it to allow the same thing? What would be the penalties for that?
3. Do dockless bikes and scooters and such need a permanent location for their vehicles in order to get a permit?
Our sidewalk obstruction/vending discussion seems to say so:
https://www.cambridgema.gov/theworks/ourservices/ticketingandenforcement/businesssidewaikuse
4. Do we really think the sidewalk vending permit was appropriate to stop Bird? I thought that was a real stretch. I
don't deny that we need some sort of permitting program, but this seemed super stop-gap. What are we going
to do when they fill out the permit application?
If the use and parking of electric scooters is the problem, it seems like privately owned scooters pose the same
challenges but we have no permitting authority over them
If Bird needed a permit to offer scooters for 'rent' on sidewalks, why don't people who offer cars and trucks for
rent on streets need the same permit?
5. Do companies like Antbike or Lime or Bird need City permits to rent their devices on private land?
On state owned land?
6. Are we communicating with any other cities that are ahead of us in this Micromobility discussion to review their
permitting programs?
7. Can we require shared mobility/Micromobility platforms to be installed/supported as part of our Special
Permitting processes or are we somehow restricted to linking those to Hubway Bike stations rather than, say,
Bonzer parking & charging stations.
8. Can we put on our own use and insurance requirements on any of these platforms that want to operate in
Cambridge? For example, can we require that Bird Scooter carry a certain insurance coverage limit as is the case
for STRs?
9. Can we separate electric devices from traditional human powered ones when it comes to permitting or must
Ebikes and regular bikes and scooters all be subject to the same permitting rules?
10. Can we require certain types of data sharing as part of existing permitting programs?
1
In the context of these questions, and some others that might come up, I am hoping to better understand the City's
roadmap for using permitting processes as a way to guide these new uses to get what works best for Cambridge.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks a lot.
Craig
2
12/5/2018
ATTACHINIENTB
Permitting Micromobility in
Cambridge
Public Safety Committee
5 December 2018
The Goal
To Keep This Person Safe
1
12/5/2018
The Goal
To Allow This Sort Of New Use On Our Public Way
The Challenge
• How Do We Permit & License This New "Stuff?"
• Are We Dedicating Enough Resources To This Effort?
Trending Digs now v
Uber reportedly considering Bird or Lime
acquisition to grow micro-mobility business
We've seen this "UBER-style"
scenario before and it's not a
good story.
UBER
2
12/5/2018
Currently These Commercial Uses Are
Allowed On Our Public Ways
metre
BONZER CAR SHARIN
www.bonzer.rocks
But Not This
3
12/5/2018
Some Questions
Where do we have authority to permit/license?
On Private Property
On State/MBTA Property
Visit Dunkin
Located on the
lower level
Some Questions
Where do we get authority to permit/license?
From the State?
Do we just have it as City?
CHINES NUTS
TENSIS
SICILLUM
HOVSSYN
4
12/5/2018
Some Questions
Do we need to ask the State for new
permitting powers?
Sidewalk Business Use
as use sidewak abstraction t
to he cond ww be servedas can or outcoo
nesting or if the obstruction is of a permanent nature
Is this really our best
regulatory tool?
a Name or Business name of petitioner
b Business address
C. Type of obstructien
g Pettioner's signature, telephone number, emergency contact number and email
address
submit with this patition a certificate of insurance that names the City
ionally insured and the certifcate holder in an amount not less
Some Questions
Who Might We Want To Partner With?
For Research?
For Implementation?
The MAPC Region
MACTO
National Association of City Transportation Officials
DiE.
NACTO Releases Guidelines for the Regulation and
MARE
Management of Shared Active Transportation
5
12/5/2018
DISCUSSION
3650130
• Fees
regulate
In case of
Number of
(Min, max)
agreement
• Tools used to
• Costs/ revenue-
violations/fines
scooter per day
Minimum rides per
sharing agreement
Duration of license
operators/scooters
Program
power
options
agreement
Data-sharing
Data security
• Insurance and
considerations 1
indemnification
• Operating Zones
• Safety measures
Parking and locking
• Maximum speed and
ATTACHMENTC
Source: Curbed LA
program
company
• Company
with users
• Community
information
deployment
engagement
communication
• Equal access to
• Equitable vehicle
eligible programs
Program
• Pricing and income-
process
• Website
with City
• Company
to support
• Public input
considerations 2
communication
• City staff needed
• Winter operations
NACTO: https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/NACTO-Shared-Active-Transportation-Guidelines.pdf