Search ▸ Agenda item attachment
A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 19-42, regarding sidewalk markings for mobility devices
MEMORANDUM
To:
Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager
From:
Joseph E. Barr, Director
Date:
October 7, 2019
Subject:
Awaiting Report 19-42 – Sidewalk Markings for Mobility Devices
This memo is in response to Order No. 7 from the April 1, 2019 City Council
Meeting (Awaiting Report No. 19-42) requesting that the City report on its plans
for this construction season to install sidewalk markings that appropriately
indicate what types of mobility devices are allowed on which sidewalks. We
have conferred with the City Solicitor in preparing this response.
Currently, the Traffic, Parking, + Transportation Department installs sidewalk
stencils and signs indicating that riding bicycles on sidewalks is not allowed in
certain business districts around the city, as a visible reminder to travelers of
the restrictions in the City’s Traffic Regulations. As noted in the original Policy
Order, many types of mobility devices are used on City streets and sidewalks,
and it is often not clear to travelers which devices are allowed in which parts of
the public rights-of-way. This has created a desire for additional information
about which of these devices are allowed or prohibited on sidewalks in
business districts. However, in addition to the City’s Traffic Regulations, the use
of these devices on sidewalks is also governed by state law, which generally
supersedes our regulations (for example, the current prohibition on the use of
motorized scooters on sidewalks exists in both the Traffic Regulations and in
Chapter 90 of the Massachusetts General Laws).
Because of the rapid pace of development of these devices, many of the
definitions and rules surrounding the use of such mobility devices (particularly
electric scooters and electric bicycles) are currently being discussed and
debated in the state legislature. It seems likely that both the legal definitions for
these types of devices and the locations where use is allowed or prohibited will
change as the result of these legislative processes, which could then impact
our Traffic Regulations and the messages that we want to deliver to street and
sidewalk users.
Although we had originally expected that these legislative changes would occur
earlier this year, it is not clear exactly when these issues will be resolved, and it
is becoming less likely that we will have clarity on these questions during the
current construction season. Based on this ongoing uncertainty, it seems
prudent to wait to make changes to our signs and/or pavement markings until
these questions have been fully addressed at the state level, at which point we
can make any necessary changes to the City’s Traffic Regulations and provide
any associated communications to street and sidewalk users.
In addition to this legislative uncertainty, there is also a significant challenge
regarding how to communicate this information clearly, given the wide (and
growing) range of devices that are in use by the public. Some cities have
started to experiment with different graphics to provide this information (see
examples below from New York City and Santa Monica, although both of those
municipalities use such graphics in parks and use larger “A-frame” signs, not
sidewalk stencils), but there is not yet a consistent symbol or approach that is
widely used. Although we intend to develop appropriate communications tools
for these messages, we do not yet have these tools in place, particularly given
the legislative issues described above.
Based on these facts, we do not have any specific plans to install additional
markings or signs during this construction season. However, we do recognize
the need for additional communications with street and sidewalk users about
allowed devices, and are committed to addressing this issue going forward.
Although we hope to receive clarity on the definitions and restrictions under
state law by early next spring, either way we intend to reevaluate whether there
are additional actions that need to be taken in advance of next year’s
construction season.
New York City (Central Park)
Santa Monica (Palisades Park)