Search ▸ Agenda item attachment
A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to a Planning Board recommendation to adopt the Incentive Zoning Contribution Rate Zoning Petition
⚠ This document is a scan; its text was recovered by optical character recognition and may contain errors. The original PDF is authoritative.
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
PLANNING BOARD
CITY HALL ANNEX, 344 BROADWAY, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139
Date:
February 18, 2020
Subject:
Incentive Zoning Contribution Rate Zoning Petition
Recommendation: The Planning Board recommends ADOPTION.
To the Honorable, the City Council,
On February 11, 2020, the Planning Board (the "Board"') held a public hearing on a City Council
zoning petition (the "Petition") to amend Article 11.000 of the Zoning Ordinance to increase the
Housing Contribution Rate for "Incentive Projects" as defined in Article 2.000. The Petition
would amend Section 11.202(b) to increase the Housing Contribution Rate from $17.10 per
square foot to $19.10 per square foot. At the public hearing, the Board received a presentation
and testimony from the Community Development Department ("CDD") staff and Karl F.
Seidman, the author of the December 2019 Cambridge Incentive Zoning Ordinance Nexus Study
Final Report (the "Study"), and heard testimony from members of the public.
Following discussion of the Study and the Petition, the Board voted to strongly recommend that
the City Council adopt the Petition. The Board enthusiastically supports the City's efforts to
increase funding for affordable housing production in the City. Further, Board members agreed
that the contribution rate should be substantially larger and encouraged the City Council to
consider further increases. Board members raised questions about the various assumptions that
provided the basis for the Study's recommendations and urged consideration of other issues,
such as displacement of residents in existing housing and the effects of commercial demand on
new housing production in Cambridge. Board members also urged consideration of how
substantially raising the fee could discourage development, cause increases in commercial rents,
or otherwise affect Cambridge's overall economic balance and competitiveness in a regional
market.
Respectfully submitted for the Planning Board,
Catherine Preston (onmolly (55)
Catherine Preston Connolly, Chair.
Page 1 of 1