Search ▸ Agenda item attachment
A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-52, regarding a report on what impact the Executive Order on Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping may have on the City of Cambridge
⚠ This document is a scan; its text was recovered by optical character recognition and may contain errors. The original PDF is authoritative.
Assistant City Solicitors
Nancy E. Glowa
Paul S. Kawai
City Solicitor
Keplin K. U. Allwaters
Arthur J. Goldberg
TITS ATONDE
Sean M. McKendry
Deputy City Solicitor
Megan B. Bayer
Brian A. Schwartz
Samuel A. Aylesworth
First Assistant City Solicitor
Public Records Access Officer
Seah Levy
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE
Office of the City Solicitor
795 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
February 8, 2021
Louis A. DePasquale
City Manager
City of Cambridge
City Hall, 795 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Re:
Response to Awaiting Report No. 20-52 Requesting a Report on Determining
What Impact the Executive Order on Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping
May Have on the City of Cambridge and its Community Partners and What
Options the City May Have to Work Around this Order
Dear Mr. DePasquale:
I write in response to the above-referenced awaiting report item seeking a "report on
determining what impact the executive order on combating race and sex stereotyping may have
on the City of Cambridge and its community partners and what options the city may have to
work around this order." As explained in more detail below, former President Trump's
Executive Order 13950 of September 22, 2020 (the "2020 Executive Order") has been revoked
by President Biden's Executive Order On Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved
Communities Through the Federal Government of January 20, 2021 (the "2021 Executive
Order"), and thus, the provisions of the 2020 Executive Order are no longer in effect. In
addition, City staff have surveyed those departments which were most likely to receive federal
grants for any programs with a diversity component, specifically, the Community Development
Department, the Human Rights Commission, the Department of Human Service Programs, the
Cambridge Police Department, and the Public Health Department. None of those departments'
federal grants funded any programs with a diversity education component that would have
triggered Executive Order 13950 and thus called the funding into question.
By way of background, former President Trump issued the 2020 Executive Order, which
sought to, among other things, require federal grant recipients, as a condition of receiving a
grant, to certify that the funds received would not be used to promote certain
Facsimile [phone removed]
Telephone [phone removed]
TTY/TTD [phone removed]
ideology. Specifically, the 2020 Executive Order would have jeopardized the funding of
programs funded by federal grants that included a diversity education component that promoted
any of the following: "that (a) one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex; (b) an
individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether
consciously or unconsciously; (c) an individual should be discriminated against or receive
adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her race or sex; (d) members of one race or
sex cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race or sex; (e) an
individual's moral character is necessarily determined by his or her race or sex; (f) an individual,
by virtue of his or her race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other
members of the same race or sex; (g) any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or
any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex; or (h) meritocracy
or traits such as a hard work ethic are racist or sexist, or were created by a particular race to
oppress another race."
The City's first step in addressing the potential effects of the 2020 Executive Order was to
reach out to City departments to determine whether any City programs funded by federal grants
contained a diversity education component that promoted any of the topics listed in (a) through
(h) above, and thus, would be potentially jeopardized. As noted above, none of the City
departments which were most likely to receive federal grants to fund programs with a diversity
education component had any federal grants for programs that promote any of the prohibited
topics listed in Executive Order 13950, and thus, none of the federal grants of any of those
departments would have been impacted by Executive Order 13950. Moreover, President Biden
signed the 2021 Executive Order on January 20, 2021, which, at Section 10(a), revoked the 2020
Executive Order. Thus, the issues presented by the 2020 Executive Order are now moot as a
result of President Biden's revocation of same via the 2021 Executive Order.
If you have any questions on this matter, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
Nancy E. Glowa
City Solicitor
Page 2 of 2