Search ▸ Agenda item attachment
A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a Planning Board recommending adoption of the BZA Stipends Zoning Petition, with additional comments
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
P L A N N I N G B O A R D
CITY HALL ANNEX, 344 BROADWAY, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139
Page 1 of 1
Date:
December 14, 2022
Subject:
Board of Zoning Appeal (BZA) Stipends Zoning Petition
Recommendation:
ADOPTION, with additional comments.
To the Honorable, the City Council,
On December 6, 2022, the Planning Board (the “Board”) held a public hearing to discuss a
Zoning Petition by the City Council to amend Section 10.12 of the Zoning Ordinance to delete
the sentence that currently reads “They shall serve without compensation” with respect to BZA
members (the “Petition”).
Following public comment, questions to staff from the City’s Community Development
Department (CDD) and Law Department, and discussion among Board members, the Planning
Board voted to transmit a favorable recommendation on this Petition to the City Council, with
the following comments.
The Board understands that the Petition is related to a City effort to begin providing stipends to
members of various appointed boards and commissions. The Board sees no reason why BZA
members should be singled out as ineligible for stipends if they are provided to members of
similar boards and commissions.
Board members expressed different views on the merits of providing stipends to members of
boards and commissions. Several Board members and CDD staff noted that the time and cost of
serving on these groups can discourage some community members who would otherwise bring
valuable perspectives to the process. However, some members expressed the view that stipends
might not make a considerable difference in participation. Some members said that we would not
know for sure until we tried.
Before offering stipends, the Board strongly recommends that the City determine how it might
change the status of certain members as “special municipal employees” under state conflict-of-
interest laws. A change in that designation could impact members with certain qualifications.
The Planning Board voted 8-0 in favor of transmitting the above recommendation.
Respectfully submitted for the Planning Board,
Catherine Preston Connolly, Chair.