Search ▸ Communication to the City Council
CRT 2016 #27 · Communication to the City Council · Jun 13 2016
a report from Councillor Dennis J. Carlone, Co-Chair of the Ordinance Committee, for a public hearing held on May 25, 2016 to amend the Zoning Map in the Riverside neighborhood from the existing Residence C-1 to Residence C within the area bounded by Franklin and River Streets and Putnam Avenue
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
1
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
2
●
Strong support for rezoning : 100 neighbors signatures on
petition.
●
Riverside is a target for developers.
●
There are multiple structures being built on small lots
●
Developers are going to the maximum limits for zoning at
the detriment of the neighborhood character.
●
Trend of increasing structure size
●
Loss of open space and green space in Riverside.
●
Water control and drainage - decrease in permeable
surfaces. Current homes have already been affected by
new construction.
Petition to Rezone from C-1 to C
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
3
Riverside - existing - with open, permeable backyards.
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
4
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
5
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
6
Riverside - newer structure
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
7
Multiple structures on one lot - at max FAR - note minimal setbacks
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
8
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
9
Multiple structures on one
lot.. Loss of open space
and increase in
impermeable surfaces
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
10
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
11
parking and impermeable surfaces.
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
12
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
13
2003 - Riverside Neighborhood Study
●
Character and Scale. Each of the subareas in Riverside has its own
particular character and scale.
●
Riverside residents place high value on the existing character and scale of
the Residential Core….
●
The Residential Core has already experienced changes to the original
fabric…
●
There are very few developable parcels in Riverside and even fewer
multiple, contiguous parcels. Nevertheless, …...it is conceivable that
development pressures could increase to the point that acquisition and
demolition of existing small residential buildings might occur.
●
High Water Table/Drainage. Riverside residents periodically experience
flooded basements and in many cases have been unable to determine the
cause.
●
The Riverside Neighborhood experiences significant traffic impacts
●
Riverside residents often find it difficult or impossible to locate on-street
parking in the neighborhood
Riverside Planning History
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
14
2011 - Riverside Neighborhood Study Update
●
Explore ways to reduce impervious surfaces such as
driveways in the neighborhood
●
Explore option to reduce cut through traffic from Western
Avenue side streets to avoid the Western Avenue back
up during peak traffic hours.
●
Improve biking conditions on Putnam Avenue.
Riverside Planning History
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
15
●
The GIS maps are very useful for visualization
●
FAR - 22% of parcels are “impacted” (0.6 - 0.75)
●
Open Space - 11% impacted (30% ‐ 36%)
●
LA per DU - 14% impacted (1500 - 1800 sq.ft.)
●
Add. Dwelling Unit Pot. loss - 26 (47 in C-1; 21 in C)
Petition Area: 372 parcels, 1258 dwelling units,
Potential Additional DU Loss: 2%
●
The fact that 60% of parcels exceed current FAR is not a
reason to give up on rezoning. We are looking at effect
of future developments. The non-conforming parcels are
have a distinct distribution (see FAR map in CDD
memo). The Riverside Core is at or below FAR.
●
Loss of open space in the core is a major issue.
CDD Memo and Other Observations
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
16
●
Modest changes in zoning parameters - similar to
Cambridgeport Seeking parity with Cambridgeport (C
zoning)
●
Small negative effects on current status - modest
expansions of existing structures still possible.
●
Positive impact going forward
●
Prefer not to create micro-zoning for Riverside - but may
be needed.
Nature of the Proposal - negative effects?
Riverside Neighborhood Zoning Petition - March 30, 2016
17
●
Preserve residential core open space
●
Preserve core neighborhood character
●
Reduce loss of permeable surfaces
●
Maintain water drainage performance
●
Allow developers to build to max allowed parameters with
confidence.
Positive Effects of Proposal