Search ▸ Communication to the City Council
COF 2016 #32 · Communication to the City Council · Jun 20 2016
a communication from Councillor Craig Kelley, regarding Short-Term Rentals in Cambridge: An Overview of Current Usage and Patterns as well as Policy Recommendations
Craig A. Kelley
City Councillor
CAMBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM :
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Craig Kelley, Cambridge City Councillor
Wilford Durbin, Aide
June 16, 2016
Short-Term Rentals in Cambridge: An Overview of Current Usage and Patterns as
well as Policy Recommendations
Donna, please include this memo in the Communications from City Officer's for the Council
Meeting on June,
----
---
~ntroduction
Reports of this kind have in the past begun with a broad overview defining the nature of our
increasingly "shared economy," its myriad benefits, and its most popular examples for the aid
of the unconnected. The near ubiquitous permeation of services such as Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb
into the daily lives and routines of Cambridge residents makes such a review all but
unnecessary, and it is omitted here.
As the more than 600 unique Airbnb listings in Cambridge attest, the City is already integrated
into the new shared economy of short-term rentals, yet some regulations and standards for
such dwellings dat es to the 1990s. That gap has opened niche entrepreneurial opportunities for
some residents, and raised concern for others that the safety, afford ability, and character of
their neighborhoods is at risk. Plodding into the middle of that tension are faceless commercial
users that convert hundreds of apartment units and even whole buildings into short-term rental
units at the exclusion of potential residents.
To address these and still other concerns, numerous local and state authorities are
implementing regulations, sometimes with the support of Airbnb, to create a shared economy
that is fair to both entrepreneurs and residents, and guarant ees the safety of users.
1
CITY HALL, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139
(61 7) 349-4280 FAX (61 7) 349-4287 TTY/TDD: (61 7) 349-4242 EMAIL: ckelley@cambridgema.gov
Cambridge is in the midst of a housing crisis, particularly for working-class families. The
very nature of the Cambridge housing market means that several truisms of the sharing
economy are upending by commercial users, or those operators with more than two
unique short-term rental apartments.
Traditionally, the sharing economy allows individuals to make better use of under-
utilized spaces, but in Cambridge the effect is not to increase utility, but often to convert
long-term tenancy space to short-term transient accommodations. More and more
frequently, these transactions are not peer-to-peer based as the sharing economy
promotes, but rather commercial user-to-transient renter transactions.
For a growing number of commercially listed units, the notion of a shared economy is
corrupted. Such spaces are not being shared by Cambridge residents with visitors of the
City, but just the opposite-access is denied to current and potential Cambridge
residents who might otherwise occupy such apartments.
In such cases, short-term rental usage is neither peer-to-peer based, nor truly exists for
the "shared economy."
For the majority of short-term operators in Cambridge, however, the goal is not to make
a profit, but to make ends meet. According to an Economic Impact statement released
by Airbnb, the average host earned "$8,020, renting out her home about 68 nights per
year." 1 This extra income helps some operators afford the inflated Cambridge housing
market and offsets the high cost of living in the Boston Metropolitan Area.
Lacking uniform regulation and guidance, some individuals operate extra-legally in
neighborhoods that are not zoned to permit transient accommodations, and may
neglect to provide such basic safety precautions as emergency exit plans that are
common in other lodging houses. It is unclear whether Cambridge could even inspect a
properly run Airbnb unit through its lnspectional Services Department to ensure
compliance with all other safety and sanitary regulations. Such individuals should not be
left in limbo, particularly when it is really the wellbeing of tourists, professionals, and
students that regularly visit Cambridge that is being wagered.
1 "Economic Impacts in Boston," Airbnb.com (December 18, 2014) http://blog.airbnb.com/economic-impacts-
boston/. (Such estimates gloss over the boom and bust distribution of rental units and bookings which cluster
around popular locations, and the figures have surely risen since 2013-2014 when the study was conducted.)
2
Short~ Term Rental Use in Cambridge and Boston Metropolitan Area
A comprehensive study of short term rental use in Cambridge has not yet been produced, and
thus the information provided below is a compilation of available data. Commissioning such a
study should be the first step any Council Committee takes toward drafting new policy. Most of
the research available is for Airbnb, by far the most popular short-term rental facilitator.
N
in
As of August 2015, a Globe review found 591 unique Airbnb listings in Cambridge,
though that number has surely risen. Information obtained on Airdna.com, which sells
reports on market trends and analysis to Airbnb hosts, suggests that the number of
listings in Cambridge may have risen to 684 rental units as of the end of May, 2016. If
accurate, the City would have experienced a 13.5 percent increase in Airbnb listings in
3
just 9 months. A July 2014 article in the Globe found nearly 3,500 listings in the Boston
area, a 63 percent increase since the previous year. 2
The same Globe report found 1,496 listings in Boston, with an average of 0.26 Airbnb
listings per 10 acres, and 5911istings in Cambridge at an average of 1.295 per 10 acres,
giving Cambridge an Airbnb density 49 times that of Boston's. The locations of Airbnb
units is not uniformly distributed around the City, as areas next to popular tourist
locations or public transportation have the highest concentration of short term rental
units.
Back Bay had the highest number of listings per neighborhood in Boston with 188. A
survey of available listings on Airbnb.com in a similarly sized area of Mid-Cambridge
suggests that the neighborhood might have as many as 1611istings, yet Mid-Cambridge
has only 6,615 dwellings, or 59 percent less than Back Bay's 11,153 dwellings.3
The average cost per night of an Airbnb listing in Cambridge was $164.75, higher than
any other city surrounding Boston, but lower than the $181.09 average for Boston. The
Downtown neighborhood of Boston had the highest average cost per night at $274.10.4
The average cost per night for each individual Cambridge neighborhood was not
included in the Globe article, but areas surrounding the most popular locations in
Cambridge and Boston are likely to be priced at similar premiums.
As of a recent request (June 13, 2016) to the Airbnb.com website for a rental July 22-23,
the highest-priced listing was "Harvard/MIT: Convenience & Luxury" a 3BR apartment in
Central Square with washer/dryer access, eat-in-kitchen, and porch access for $499 per
night. The listing had 145 reviews dating back to 2014, with 12 reviews in the month of
May 2016 alone. (Note: a rental may not always result in a review, so the actual number
of rentals may be more.)
2 Matt Rocheleau, "Interesting facts about Airbnb in Boston," The Boston Globe (August 24, 2015). Beth Teitell,
"Many hasten to turn their bedrooms into inns on Airbnb," The Boston Globe (July 15, 2014).
3 For Back Bay data: City of Boston, "Boston in Context: Neighborhoods," Boston Redevelopment Authority
Research Division Analysis (March 2016). For Mid-Cambridge data: City of Cambridge, "Neighborhood Profile: Mid:
Cambridge I Area 6," Community Development Department {2013).
4 Matt Rocheleau, "Interesting facts about Airbnb in Boston," The Boston Globe (August 24, 2015). Matt Rocheleau,
"Lawmakers worry owners taking advantage of Airbnb: Short-term rentals may get rules, taxes," The Boston Globe
(August 24, 2015).
4
A Globe review found that 15 percent of Airbnb hosts in Boston have posted multiple
listings, with 1,062 users posting 1,496 units. In a growing trend, 64 hosts listed three or
more properties in Boston. Of all hosts in Boston, 82 percent listed their primary
residence, 8 percent listed an investment property, 6 percent listed a secondary
residence, and 4 percent listed an in-law suite.
Hosts with the highest number of listings are not likely to be individuals, but commercial
entities according to the Globe. The host with the highest number of listings in Boston,
SeamlessTransitions, had 56 properties and provides "an array of services to help
companies move people to a new city."
Landlords with properties near popular destination can make more money by removing
long-term rental units from the housing market to make available for Airbnb users. From
the Globe:
One Everett landlord said that he and his business partner recently
converted 13 of the 100 apartments they own across Boston,
Everett, and Chelsea from standard yearlong rentals into short-
term rentals, and then listed them on Airbnb.
"It's more profitable for us ... and we don't have to deal with the
hassle of a regular tenant," said Jose, 25, who asked that his full
name not be published because he fears that officials would try to
shut his operation down. "You can easily triple the income going
through Airbnb, compared to a regular rental. "5
According to Airdna.com, as many as 47.7 percent (326 units) of Airbnb listings in
Cambridge offer "Entire Place" rentals, 50.7 percent are "Private Rooms," and 1.6
percent offer a "Shared Room." Citywide, 77 percent of listings include washer/dryer
access, and 80 percent include air-conditioning. The frequent turnover can cause
environmental impacts above what one might observe in a long-term rental unit. One
Central Square resident reported taking 30 pounds of linens and towels to the
laundromat every few weeks.6
5 Matt Rocheleau, "Lawmakers worry owners takiDE advantage of Airbnb: Short-term rentals may get rules, taxes,"
The Boston Globe (August 24, 2015).
6 "Cambridge, Massachusetts: Airbnb Data and Analytics-June 2016," Airdna.com (Accessed June 13, 2016).
https://www .airdna .co/city/us/massachusetts/cambridge ?report=us massachusetts cambridge#. Beth Teitel I,
"Many hasten to turn their bedrooms into inns on Airbnb," The Boston Globe (July 15, 2014).
5
Airbnb and other short-term rental units fall under the definition of "Tourist house in an
existing dwelling" in 4.31.i.1 of Cambridge's Zoning Code. Such tourist houses are not permitted
to operate in locations zoned for Res A 1&2, Res B, Bus A-1, A-2, A-3, and require a special
permit in other zoned areas.
If the geographic data provided in the afore mentioned Globe is accurate, there may have been
as many as 40 unique Airbnb rental units listed in the neighborhood of North Cambridge in
August 2015. Most of that neighborhood, however, is zoned as Res B or Bus A-2 which does not
permit transient accommodations. Of the 40 Airbnb units in North Cambridge, as many as 35
are operating in a dwelling not zoned for that use. The neighborhoods of Strawberry Hill, West
Cambridge, Neighborhood Nine, and Agassiz, also with large portions zoned as Res A orB, are
also not zoned to permit transient housing, and yet many Airbnb listings are recorded there.
Residents' Complaints on Short-Term Rental Units in Their
Neighborhood-Building "being operated as an 18-room 'hotel' via
Airbnb."
Inspection a I Services receives and responds to numerous resident-generated complaints
regarding short-term rental units in their neighborhood, with more coming each month as the
popularity of Airbnb grows. Their complaints confirm for Cambridge the pattern of zoning
violation, commercial user listings, and public disturbance that has been observed in other
cities.
Residents have complained about their landlord using units in the same building as "a Vacation
House," renting the bottom two of four floors for more than a year. Such rentals are
"disruptive," another resident complained, "on a day by day basis, I see numbers of people
coming and going." That same resident related an experience from the previous year when a
short-term rental guest, "unknown to me, stood on the sidewalk ... for over an hour watching me
clean my front porch ... directly across the street. When I finished he went to sit on the front step
of the rental unit...and later went in. His behavior made me feel uncomfortable."
Increasingly, Cambridge residents are reporting commercial user operations that advertise
multiple units in the same building, housing a reported 8 to 18 short-term renters.
One resident near Harvard University became suspicious after noticing large volumes of
transient renters, and discovered several Airbnb listings for the same apartment (Attachment
A). Seeking to maximize the number of unique rentals the apartment could handle, the
operator created eight individual listings for rooms in the same unit. Despite using the same
6
exterior photo in all the advertisements, each listing was displayed at a different address in
Airbnb, making monitoring difficult.
With affordable housing already scarce in the City, the report from one resident as recently as
June 10, 2016, that a building on Memorial Drive was "being operated as an 18-room 'hotel' via
Airbnb" is particular alarming. Having recently purchased the building, the owners converted
the entire apartment building directly into short-term rental space for Airbnb users. In that
instance, lnspectional Services notified the owners that the usage violated the zoning ordinance
in 2015, but compliance was only temporary. As the resident reported:
"the building owner, he did cease to rent out rooms
individually/short term and began advertising three units with
one-month minimum stay. We have seen a few people in the
building on a longer term basis; however, several rooms are still
being rented for short stays (some just one night). At first it was
sporadic, but over the last couple of months we've seen a huge
increase in the number of temporary lodgers, with dozens of
people in and out."
A Useful Model-Key Findings from New York City's Report
11Airbnb in
the City"
In October 2014, the New York State Office of the Attorney General released a sweeping review
of Airbnb listings in the City using information obtained following a lawsuit against the
company.7 Following that data acquisition, Airbnb pledged to share its data more freely with
the City in an effort to "build an 'open and transparent' community." It was later revealed,
however, that Airbnb '"misled the media and the public' by removing more than 1,000 listings
from its site ... before making available the data."8
The following quotes the key findings of the NYS Office of the Attorney General's report
"Airbnb in the City."9 These key findings have been reprinted in their entirety because, while
New York City and the Boston Metro Area are very different cities, the report offers a useful
model for predicting trends and usage in Cambridge in the absence of regulation. The report
analyzed data on Airbnb bookings from January 1, 2010 to June 2, 2014 (the "Review Period").
State and local laws in New
York-including the Multiple Dwelling Law and the New York City Administrative Code-
7 David Streitfeld, "Airbnb Will Hand Over Host Data to New York," New York Times (May 21, 2014).
8 Mike Isaac, "Airbnb Releases Trove of New York City Home-Sharing Data," New York Times, (December 1, 2015).
Jonah Bromwich, "Airbnb Purged New York Listings to Create Rosier Portrait, Report Say'i.J" New York times
(February 11, 2016).
9 New York State Office of the Attorney General, Airbnb in the City, State of New York (October 2014).
7
prohibit certain short-term rentals. During the Review Period, 72 percent of units used
as private short-term rentals on Airbnb appeared to violate these laws.
Ninety-four percent of Airbnb hosts offered at most
two unique units during the Review Period. But the remaining six percent of hosts
dominated the platform during that period, offering up to hundreds of unique units,
accepting 36 percent of private short-term bookings, and receiving $168 million, 37
percent of all host revenue. This report refers to these hosts as "Commercial Users."
to Run
Well over 100 Commercial Users each controlled 10 or more
unique Airbnb units during the Review Period. Together, these hosts accepted 47,103
private short-term reservations and earned $59.4 million in revenue. The highest-
earning operation administered 272 unique Airbnb listings, booked 3,024 reservations,
and received $6.8 million in revenue during the Review Period. Each of the top 12 New
York City operations on Airbnb during that period earned revenue exceeding $1 million.
In 2013, more than 4,600 units were booked as short-term rentals through Airbnb for
three months of the year or more. Of these, nearly 2,000 units were booked as short-
term rentals for a cumulative total of half the year or more-rendering them largely
unavailable for use by long-term residents. Notably, the share of revenue to Airbnb and
its hosts from units booked as private short-term rentals for more than half the year
increased steadily, accounting for 38 percent of each figure by 2013.
to Serve as
New York law
does not permit commercial enterprises to operate hostels, where multiple, unrelated
guests share tight quarters. In 2013, approximately 200 units in New York City were
booked as private short-term rentals for more than 365 nights during the year. This
indicates that multiple transients shared the same listing on the same night, as they
would in an illegal hostel. The 10 most-rented units for private short-term rentals were
each booked for an average of about 1,900 nights in 2013, with the top listing accepting
13 reservations on an average night.
in New
Bookings in just three Community Districts in Manhattan-the Lower East
Side/Chinatown, Chelsea/Hell's Kitchen, and Greenwich Village/SoHo-accounted for
approximately $187 million in revenue to hosts, or more than 40 percent of private stay
revenue to hosts during the Review Period. By contrast, all the reservations in three
boroughs (Queens, Staten Island, and the Bronx) brought hosts revenue of $12 million-
less than three percent of the New York City total.
8
State Regulations Currently Under Consideration, Backed by Airbnb
Recently proposed regulations on Airbnb and similar platforms were introduced under "An Act
regulating short-term resident rentals" (H2618) in January 2015. That act was redrafted in the
House Committee on Revenue and reported out as the current H4236 "An Act providing for
local aid enhancement." H4236 is currently in the House Ways and Means Committee awaiting
further action.
The proposed regulation clarifies currently used definitions such as "hotel," "lodging house/'
and "motel," and defines "transient accommodation" to include: "any vacation, leisure or
short-term rental accommodation offering occupancy in exchange for rent, including but not
limited to an apartment, single or multiple family housing, cottage, condominium, time-share
unit or any furnished residential accommodation within any zoned for residential or
commercial use that is not a hotel, motel, lodging house, or bed and breakfast establishment."
The language clarifies a memorandum from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and
Human Services of May 16, 2014, that determined Airbnb and other short-term rentals were
"subject to local licensure or permitting as a lodging house or bed and breakfast."10
According to a Globe article on the proposed legislation, the bill"has support from Airbnb,
HomeAway and Short Term Rentals Boston." A statement obtained by the Globe asserted that
Airbnb is "eager to work with policymakers to help our community in Massachusetts collect and
remit hotel taxes to the state ... This bill would simplify the complicated tax structure that our
hosts face and help ensure the state and the localities receive their fair share of tax revenue." 11
Cambridge would be required to adopt certain provisions of H4236 in order to have access to
additional excise taxes that local municipalities may impose.
The newly redrafted H4236 imposes a 5 per cent excise tax on "the total amount of rent for
each such occupancy" for each rental over $15. The legislation allows local cities and towns to
impose an additional excise on rentals not to exceed 6 per cent of the total rent, while Boston is
allowed to impose an excise not more than 6.5 per cent of the total rent. Cities are required to
adopt the provisions of H4236 prior to imposing their own excise tax.
The bill requires that reimbursement for the excise be paid by the occupant of the short-term
rental unit, which the operator shall add to the rental amount.
10 Executive Office of Health and Human Services, "Memorandum: Licensing of Online Home Rental Services,"
Massachusetts Department of Public Health (May 16, 2014).
11 Matt Rocheleau, "Should Airbnb rentals be subject to hotel taxes and regulations?," The Boston Globe (April4,
2016).
9
H4236 also states that "No person shall operate a bed and breakfast establishment, hotet
lodging house, transient accommodation or motel in this commonwealth unless a certificate of
registration has been issued to him in accordance with section 67 of chapter 62C."
Current Regulations on Short-Term Rentals in Cambridge
Cambridge's lnspectional Services frequently receive complaints from neighbors about non-
compliant Airbnb rental units operating in their neighborhood. Falling under the definition of
"Tourist house in an existing dwelling," many short-term rental units are operating in zoned
areas that do not permit transient accommodations. Airbnb rentals are not permitted in areas
zoned Res A 1&2, Res B, and Bus A-1, A-2, and A-3.
Such short-term rental units may also violate other state and local regulations on fire safety,
building code, sanitary conditions, parking, and insurance, but lnspectional Services resolves
many complaints before such further investigations are necessary simply by informing the
operating that the zoning does not support short-term rentals.
The City Council's Public Safety Committee took up the issue of Airbnb regulations during a
meeting on August 10, 2015. During that meeting, Councillors voiced support for certain types
of regulations and inspections, as long as residents occupying the dwelling were still allowed to
defray the high cost of living in Cambridge with short-term rentals. 12 Such compromise should
be regarded as a model for the current drafting process.
12 "Public Safety Committee Report from June 30, 2015: License Commission how it works, the permitting and
shared economy," City of Cambridge (August 10, 2015).
10
The 6 Airbnb rooms at 52 Kirkland Street are called
“Harvard Moment.”
Lis?ngs for 5 of the 6 rooms include iden?cal photos of
the outside of the building, shown below.
Room 1
Room 2
Room 3
Room 4
Room 5
Room 6
Map of loca?ons for the 6 rooms in Airbnb is misleading.
The 6 rooms are shown scaJered across the neighborhood.
Kirkland Street
The loca?ons are circled in black.
The Airbnb is managed by someone who gives her name
as Yvonne Ying Phing. The lis?ngs state that she does
not live there.
According to www.realtor.com, 52 Kirkland Street was
recently sold in February 2016.