Search ▸ Agenda item attachment
Agenda item attachment · Dec 2 2019
Presentations from the City Manager to the Roundtable meeting of the City Council and the School Committee on December 2, 2019
⚠ This document is a scan; its text was recovered by optical character recognition and may contain errors. The original PDF is authoritative. Anyone can check a page against it.
Key Findings &
Recommendations
of the Universal
Pre-K Study
Joint City Council/School
Committee Roundtable
December 2, 2019
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
SCHOOL
Agenda
Importance of Early Childhood
1
•
Education
Overview of Universal
2
•
Pre-Kindergarten Study
CPS Provided Universal
3
Pre-Kindergarten Model
Mixed Delivery Universal
4
Pre-Kindergarten Model
Cost Comparisons
5
•
Next Steps
6
Discussion
7
2
ELIE
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
- Pg
RUEY
Importance of Early
Childhood Education
Child Outcomes Associated with High Quality
Early Education
• Stronger social-emotional and
self-regulation skills
ANyl
• Stronger early literacy & math skills
• Reductions in referrals to special
education
• Reductions in grade-level retention
An
• Increased high school graduation
rates
• Increased college attendance rates
3
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Universal Pre-Kindergarten Study
• Key purpose: to provide roadmap for designing
a UPK system for four-year-olds that best aligns
with the realities & needs of our community.
• The City of Cambridge and Cambridge Public
Schools jointly contracted with Early Childhood
Associates (ECA) in partnership with UMASS
Donahue Institute, to:
• Analyze and evaluate two models of universal
pre-kindergarten (UPK) programs for
four-year-olds.
• Recommend a preferred model and provide
a framework of essential elements required to
build a high quality UPK system.
• Prepare population projections for ages o to
17, and enrollment projection for Pre-K to
12th grade between 2020 and 2030.
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
UPK Models Evaluated
Universal Pre-kindergarten is generally defined as a program supported
with public funding that is available to all four-year-old children.
I. A Public School Model
II. A Mixed Delivery Model
CPS converts the current JK
Pre-kindergarten programs
offered through a network of
program to a pre-kindergarten
and changes age eligibility
providers, including CPS,
Head Start, DHSP and
from 4 ½ to 4 years old.
community-based programs.
• Nationally, the most
common model of UPK is
00
Rohi
mixed delivery system.
0010000
00
•
This is the model
recommended by ECA.
5
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
High Quality UPK
The study emphasized the
programs have these
importance of high quality
things in common:
programming regardless
of UPK model:
• Meets needs of families in terms of
location, hours, and weeks of care
"Greater access to mediocre or
• Equity of access
low quality care has been shown
to further disadvantage already
• Diverse, competent and consistent staff
at risk children."
• Research-based curriculum
• Developmentally appropriate indoor
and outdoor learning environments
L
• Systems for establishing quality
criteria and on-going evaluation
• Robust family engagement and
comprehensive services
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Framework for UPK System
The study identified 7 foundational components for pre-kindergarten
systems and practices.
• Decisions about each of these components are crucial to the design of a
high quality UPK-regardless of model.
Target Populations
Costs and Financing
3
1
• All children
• Free for all
Or
Or
•
Sliding scale fee based
• Targeted subset
on family income
of children
Program Delivery
2
• Public School Model
Or
Mixed Delivery Model
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Framework for UPK System (Continued)
Governance &
Quality Assurance
Administrative Structure
• Quality Improvement
4
Leadership and oversight
Systems
• Curriculum
Fiscal and operational
• Learning Environment
management
•
Equitable and inclusive
• Program Dosage
recruitment of families
• Family Engagement
Accountability
Workforce Quality
7
5
• Data systems to
• Teacher education &
credentials
monitor & evaluate
•
•
Pipeline & career pathways
Measures of program
success
Professional development
•
Compensation
1545-
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
How Many Four Year
Old Children Live in
Cambridge?
Four Year-Old Population Projections
• In 2019, approximately 913
1200
four-year-olds live in
Cambridge.
1000
• Between 2020 and 2030,
800
the projected number of
600
four-year-olds will range
from 852 to 1051.
400
• CPS kindergarten enrollment
200
data indicate that the
0
majority of children entering
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
JK or K have been in care
outside of the home.
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
What are the
programs serving
4- year-old children
today?
• CPS - JK programs
• CPS - Special Start
• CPS - Scholars College
• CPS - Montessori
• DHSP programs
• Community-based programs
• Private programs
• For-profit programs
• Family childcare
10
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Overview of Model 1: UPK Provided by CPS
"Expansion of CPS programming
• Entry age becomes four years of
to include all children who live in
age by Sept 1 of enrollment year.
Cambridge and turn 4 years old
• CPS would eliminate mixed
by Sept 1 of the enrollment year
JK/K classrooms.
represents more than a simple
change to the entrance age to the
• CPS would implement a new,
developmentally appropriate
public school system."
pre-k curriculum.
Staff credentials and professional
development would be adjusted to
reflect early childhood focus.
• Indoor and outdoor environments
would require re-tooling.
11
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Challenges to Implementing Model 1
Lack of space is a key barrier to
implementing a universal pre-k
program hosted solely by the
Classrooms
Cambridge Public Schools.
Required
39 to 47
JK/M4 Enrollment: 390
1
3
Classroom Equivalents: 19
Additional classrooms
Currently
needed for a UPK is:
However, only 14 classrooms
could be dedicated to UPK,
25 to 33
due to current practice of
(estimate)
combined JK/K classrooms.
Between
UMDI projects Universal Pre-K
2
2020-2030
enrollment of 767 to 946
12
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Model 1 Challenges (Continued)
Projected enrollment growth for grades K to 12 during next decade
also impacts CPS's ability to add classrooms for four-year-olds.
• According to UMDI's maximum projection scenario, CPS K-12 enrollment is
expected to increase by 1,500 students between 2020 and 2030.
• 52% of the projected increase (812) is in K-5th grade
• Demand for elementary (K-5) classroom space is projected to increase
by 20% or 37 classrooms to support the enrollment increases.
200
190
- 189
+ 187
180
/ 179
Projected Number
170
165
160
K-5 Classrooms SY
159
150 152 152152 154
20-21 to SY 30-31
140
130
120
[phone removed]-29
2029-30
2027-28
2030-31
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27
2020-21
13
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
CPS K-12 Enrollment Growth
• Between 2008 and 2018, CPS added 1,112 K-12 students, an average annual
increase of 2.1%
• The UMDI maximum enrollment scenario (#5) projects an average annual
increase of 1.9% over the 10 year period between 2020 and 2030 (+1,500).
CPS K-12* Enrollment Growth
Projected K-12* Enrollment Growth
2008 to 2018
2020 to 2030 (UMDI Scenario #5)
9,000
9,000
8,000
7,111
8,000
------ 8,057
6,557
7,000
7,000
4----
5,872
— 6,489
5,377
6,000
6,000
5,000
5,000
4,000
4,000
3,000
3,000
2,000
2,000
1,000
1,000
2013
2008
2018
2030
2025
2020
*K-12 enrollment does not include 3 or 4-year-olds (JK/Montessori/Special Start).
14
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Model 1: Other Important Impacts and Considerations
Studies point to the "crowd-out" effect
of public pre-K programs on community
Loved
based providers:
• Two-thirds of CBO program directors
interviewed by ECA said that a public
school-only program would
negatively impact their programs.
• Smaller programs are likely to close
because of lost enrollment.
• Cost of programs serving children
o to 3 will increase
• High likelihood that the availability
of care decreases & cost of care
increases for children ages o to 3.
• High likelihood of less choice for
families who need full day, full year
options for four-year-olds.
15
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Overview of
Nationally, this is the
Model 2-Mixed
most common model.
Delivery System
...........
• The study strongly recommends a mixed
• The system would
include a mix of CPS
delivery system for Cambridge,
highlighting:
Pre-k classrooms,
DHSP program,
• The value of high quality community
community based
programs focused on early childhood
childcare centers, and
development.
Head Start programs.
• Family need for choice in full day,
year round programs.
• The detrimental impact of a public
school UPK (Model 1) on the
availability & cost of programs for
children o to age 3.
16
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Challenges to Implementing Model 2
The biggest challenge today is that
Cambridge does not have enough
capacity in high quality programs.
Addressing this will require:
• Increasing the number of
programs meeting state quality
rating standards.
• Developing a pipeline of qualified
teachers & career pathways with
a focus on a diverse workforce.
• Increasing workforce compensation.
• Implementing evidence-based
curriculum.
• Expanding professional
development.
17
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Cost Comparisons of Two Models
ECA also compared the annual operating costs the two models.
Costs were organized into three primary components:
• Leadership & program administration
• Classroom costs, including staff & materials
• Quality assurance
Estimated costs do not include cost of improving or building new classrooms
MODEL 1
MODEL 2
CPS UPK
Mixed Delivery
$29.8 Million or
$23.8 Million or
$28K per student
$23K per student
When factoring in the cost of building new classrooms, Model 1 is significantly
18
more expensive than Model 2.
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
1
5
3
2
4
Gather more
Gather additional
Convene
Convene
Explore options
& decisions
information
data regarding
community-
principals
impacting
and JK
about
based
existing programs
system
teachers for
in Cambridge:
providers for
Cambridge
development.
childcare
feedback
feedback
• How many
workforce,
and input.
and input.
slots are
Continued
including
filled with
learning from
credentials and
Cambridge
changes to
compensation.
children?
preschool
lottery and
Gather
• How many
sliding scale
information
slots could
fees.
and feedback
become
from families in
dedicated to
ways that
Cambridge
Next Steps:
children?
engages and
reflects diverse
Program Planning
population.
19
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Options & Decisions Impacting
System Development
• Which model best meets the
• Will family enrollment be
centralized?
needs of Cambridge
• How will providers be enrolled?
• Is the program free or is there
a sliding scale fee for families
• Will providers be paid per student
based on income?
or per classroom?
• How to ensure that each
What is the most appropriate
participating program is
governance & administrative
diverse and inclusive?
structure?
• Will pre-K classrooms be
One or Two
4-year-old only or mixed
3 and 4-year-olds?
• If a universal program is
preferred how would
implementation of universal
pre-K be phased?
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
6
10
8
7
9
Increase
Provide
Expand work
Expand Family
Expand
Childcare
financial
Scholarship
protessional
to improve
amounts in
Quality Pilot.
quality of
support to
development,
Head Start
order to expand
including
existing
number of
to expand
programs,
college courses
offered in
program hours.
participating
including
programs and
Cambridge.
support to
Expand support
children.
meet state
to programs
quality rating
around cultural
standards.
proficiency.
Next Steps:
Expanded Efforts
by Birth to Grade 3
Partnership
21
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original
Discussion
Draw.
on 4 Numbers 0 to 9
atch.
TICONDEROGA
PO95S
22
Read by machine, not yet checked by a person · check this page against the original