Search ▸ Agenda item attachment
A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to a Planning Board recommendation to adopt the Alexandria Grand Junction Overlay District Zoning Petition
⚠ This document is a scan; its text was recovered by optical character recognition and may contain errors. The original PDF is authoritative.
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
PLANNING BOARD
CITY HALL ANNEX, 344 BROADWAY, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139
Date:
November 26, 2019
Subject:
Alexandria Grand Junction Overlay District Zoning Petition
Recommendation:
The Planning Board recommends ADOPTION.
To the Honorable, the City Council,
The Planning Board held a public hearing on November 19, 2019, to discuss the third filing of
this zoning petition (the "Petition") by Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., ("the Petitioner") to
establish a Grand Junction Overlay District encompassing two non-contiguous areas referred to
as "Grand Junction Land" (a corridor running to the west of the Grand Junction rail right-of-way
from Binney Street to Cambridge Street) and "Development Land" (the former Metropolitan
Pipe site at Binney and Fulkerson Streets) with development controls contained in a new Section
20.1000 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Petition would authorize greater height and density for
commercial uses on the Development Land but would require the Grand Junction Land to be
preserved as public open space to be used for a planned multi-use pedestrian/bicycle pathway.
The Board had discussed previous versions of the Petition at hearings on January 29, 2019, June
18, 2019, and July 23, 2019. Most recently, the Board had communicated a report to the City
Council with comments but no positive or negative recommendation.
The Board received information and testimony from the Petitioner as well as members of the
public, and reviewed prior materials that were submitted regarding this Petition. Following
discussion among Board members, the Board voted to recommend that the City Council adopt
the petition, with eight members voting in favor and one member abstaining. The majority of
Board members agreed that the proposal had improved from its original iteration due to
reductions in the proposed height and scale of development that would be enabled. The Board
also appreciated the Petitioner's concerted discussions with neighboring residents as well as the
Petitioner's ongoing efforts to resolve issues related to the abutting site controlled by Eversource.
Some of the concerns previously expressed by Board members were addressed by the provision
of a detailed Letter of Commitment describing community benefits, including resources for
developing the planned Grand Junction Pathway.
Respectfully submitted for the Planning Board,
Catherine Preston (ormally (5s)
Catherine Preston Connolly, Chair.
Page 1 of 1