TheCambridge Record
Agenda ItemsCity Manager's Agenda

CMA 2006-285

The Manager's report back on the status of the Cambridge Request System. City Manager, requesting that the City Council formally appropriate/allocate the Community Preservation Act (CPA) funds as follows: 1A. 80% of FY2007 CPA revenues ($4,400,000) appropriated to Affordable Housing Trust. 1B. 10% of FY2007 CPA revenues ($550,000) appropriated to Historic Preservation. 1C. 10% of FY2007 CPA revenues ($550,000) appropriated/allocated to Open Space. 2A. 80% of FY2006 State Match revenues (received in FY2007) ($4,400,000) appropriated to Affordable Housing Trust. 2B. 10% of FY2006 State Match revenues (received in FY07) ($550,000) appropriated to Historic Preservation. 2C. 10% of FY2006 State Match revenues (received in FY07) ($550,000) appropriated/allocated to Open Space. 3A. 80% of the Fund Balance ($1,200,000) appropriated to the Affordable Housing Trust

How it started
Submitted by Robert W. Healy, City Manager: his response to the Council’s order about a report on the status of the Cambridge Request System. City Manager, requesting that the City Council formally appropriate/allocate the Community Preservation Act (CPA) funds as follows: 1A. 80% of FY2007 CPA revenues ($4,400,000) appropriated to Affordable Housing Trust. 1B. 10% of FY2007 CPA revenues ($550,000) appropriated to Historic Preservation. 1C. 10% of FY2007 CPA revenues ($550,000) appropriated/allocated to Open Space. 2A. 80% of FY2006 State Match revenues (received in FY2007) ($4,400,000) appropriated to Affordable Housing Trust. 2B. 10% of FY2006 State Match revenues (received in FY07) ($550,000) appropriated to Historic Preservation. 2C. 10% of FY2006 State Match revenues (received in FY07) ($550,000) appropriated/allocated to Open Space. 3A. 80% of the Fund Balance ($1,200,000) appropriated to the Affordable Housing Trust (AR 06-133).
What happened

The clerk's record shows no vote or disposition against this item. Some are received and filed without one, and a roundtable takes no votes at all. If the city's record shows otherwise, that is exactly what an audit should catch.