TheCambridge Record
Agenda ItemsCity Manager's Agenda

CMA 2024-107

A report submitted by the Planning Board regarding the Family Definition Zoning Petition

How it started
May 20, 2024 · Submitted by Yi-An Huang, City Manager.
What happened
May 20, 2024 · Reconsideration failed Moved by Vice Mayor Marc McGovern; failed 0–8.
Vice Mayor McGovern made a motion to reconsider the vote to refer CMA 2024 # 107 to the Ordinance Committee
The clerk's words, from the minutes of May 20, 2024.
View the roll call on the amendment

Voted no (8)

  • Marc McGovern
  • Patty Nolan
  • Joan Pickett
  • Sumbul Siddiqui
  • Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler
  • Paul F. Toner
  • Ayesha M. Wilson
  • E. Denise Simmons

Absent (1)

  • Burhan Azeem
May 22, 2024 · Heard in committee: Ordinance Committee testimony and discussion; any committee vote is in the committee's minutes
May 20, 2024 · ↪ Sent to a Council committee for closer study (Referred to committee, unanimous · one absent)
View the roll call

Voted yes (8), unanimous

  • Marc McGovern
  • Patty Nolan
  • Joan Pickett
  • Sumbul Siddiqui
  • Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler
  • Paul F. Toner
  • Ayesha M. Wilson
  • E. Denise Simmons

Absent (1)

  • Burhan Azeem
Roll call of May 20, 2024 · from the council’s minutes · photos: City of Cambridge
The document Agenda item attachment · 14 pages

The Planning Board recommends ADOPTION, with minor

corrections. To the Honorable, the City Council, On May 7, 2024, the Planning Board (the "Board") held a public hearing to discuss a Zoning Petition by the City Council to amend Articles 2.000, 4.000, 5.000, 6.000, 11.000, 13.000, 14.000, 17.000, 20.000, and 22.000 of the Cambridge Zoning Ordinance to remove references to "degree of kinship" from the definitions of "Family" and "Lodging House" and make related changes to residential use definitions.

The Board received written materials before the hearing from Community Development Department (CDD) staff, heard a presentation from CDD staff, heard public comment, and asked clarifying questions of CDD staff and the Acting City Solicitor. After discussion among Board members, the Board voted unanimously to send a positive recommendation to the City Council. Board members agreed that this Petition is a positive step to bring the code up to current standards and address an issue of concern to the LGBTQ+ community.

Board members also appreciated the thoroughness of the petition and the effort to provide clearer definitions, which will help the ordinance work better but is difficult to do without having unintended consequences. Board members noted some minor inconsistencies to be fixed and recommended that staff review those inconsistencies and provide a revised text to the Council with corrections. The Planning Board voted 6-0 in favor of transmitting the above report. Respectfully submitted for the Planning Board,

Tom trement

Tom Sieniewicz, Vice Chair. Page 1 of 1

Zoning Petition Text - Planning Board Recommended Edits

… read the rest →

🗓 The meeting where this was taken up: May 20, 2024