CMA 2024-221
An update from the Human Resources Department
Voted yes (9), unanimous
Burhan Azeem
Marc McGovern
Patty Nolan
Sumbul Siddiqui
Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler
Paul F. Toner
Ayesha M. Wilson
Cathie Zusy
E. Denise Simmons
HR Transformation
and ERP Implement back-end systems improvements (i.e., PeopleSoft) Configure front-end modules for HR-related business This is neither comprehensive nor captures all the daily work in each area that ensures normal HR operations Complete by 2026 5 ... And we’ve continued to fill out our organizational chart with the people needed to execute on these initiatives
HR Administrative
Assistant
Constance Taber
HRBP
Workers’ Comp
Administrator
Jordan Wilkinson
HR Generalist
Khali Tabor
Personnel Analyst
Mary Greene
HRIS Specialist
Barbara Armistead
Learning/Development
Director of HR
Transformation
Seema Badaya
Talent Recruitment
Waleska Alves
Benefits Administration
Barbara Brown
Deputy Chief People
Officer
Jessica Pavao
Director of Labor Relations
Jamie Matthews
Labor Relations
Specialist
Peter Bala
HR Manager*
Jania Bell
Training Specialist
Talent Acquisition
Specialist
Arielle Spivey
Benefits Service
Representative
Vitaliy (Tony) Khachiyan
Benefits Service
Representative
Shailja Tripathi
Benefits Analyst
Jean Montout
Benefits Analyst
Chief People Officer
Raecia T. Catchings
Labor Relations Analyst
Solution Architect*
Elisabete Baker
Business Process
Analyst
Talent Co-Op/ Intern
Tyler Brogan
* long-term temporary positions We have launched an employee engagement survey this fall to assess our baseline workplace climate Who should take the engagement survey? All permanent full-and part-time employees How will the survey protect anonymity?
In no case be reported in a way that a person’s identity will be known: All data will be aggregated Any groupings where the response rate is less than 10 will be rolled up What is the employee engagement survey? Asks about the employee experience and workplace environment Most questions can be benchmarked No more than 15-25 minutes to complete How will the survey be used? Establish a baseline understanding Compare to other municipalities Helps us understand where to intensify our efforts Include in the City Manager’s performance review 8 Earlier this month, all permanent staff received either an email, a postcard, or both with a link to complete the employee survey 2,487 Colleagues received the survey 29%
Participation rate
Participation (as of 10/16) The survey is offered online only, which employees can access in two ways: Survey is offered online only Postcard: 1) Receive postcard at your home 2) Scan QR code or type URL 3) Complete survey (15-25 minutes) We’ve also been working with departments to make the survey available at worksites where there may be colleagues without computers or email E-mail: 1) Receive an email 2) Find e-mail and click the link 3) Complete survey (15-25 minutes) 9 The final report will be shared with all staff no later than November 15, 2024 September October November Leadership Together 10/21 (Today) Deadline to complete survey Share results with
City Council
Survey opened
Final report
completed We’ll convene all employees at two “town hall” style forums in early 2025 Staff have until October 28 to complete the survey, and the final report will be available by November 15, even if it takes some more time to digest the results 10
Project Goals
Internal equity: identify and mitigate pay equity disparities Market competitiveness: attract and retain highly qualified employees Ensure salaries are commensurate with the responsibilities assigned Establish justifiable pay differentials between individual roles Maintain competitive standing with similar employers in comparable geographic areas or those with similar costs of living Facilitate recognizable compensation growth over time. 11
Update: Non-Union Classification and Compensation Study (1/3)
Only non-union employees are in-scope: 685 total job codes
Work Overview
Compare pay rates to overall labor market, including both public and private sector Assess pay equity for employees performing similar work, including disparities across race, ethnicity, and gender
Compensation benchmarking
Provide recommendations for the optimal pay structure based on benchmarking and internal hierarchies Advise on other compensation strategies, such as performance and longevity pay Pay structure and policy assessment Review all job descriptions and titles Provide recommendations for more consistent job titling Job title and classification evaluation 12
Update: Non-Union Classification and Compensation Study (2/3)
Progress Updates
Released an RFQ in July and have awarded a contract Hired a project manager to start on 11/4 Pending a November start we are on track to complete the study next year and start implementation in FY26 FY26 May FY24 Aug FY25 Phase 0: Procurement Phase 1: Information Gathering Phase 2: Analysis and Proposal Phase 3: Implementation Planning Jun Jul Jun Oct Sep Feb Dec
Apr May
Jan Nov Mar 2025 2024 FY27 2026 Phase 4: Implementation (both pay and policies) 10/21 (Today) 13
Update: Non-Union Classification and Compensation Study (3/3)
Completed nearly a thousand classification and compensation studies for public entity clients in the last 10 years Has extensive benchmarking experience and a national database Has a strategic alliance with the
Public Sector Human Resources
Association (PSHRA)
14 15 With performance reviews, the City will ensure that non-union staff are having conversations about expectations and performance with their supervisors
Anticipated outcomes:
Opportunities to recognize and celebrate employees’ success and accomplishments Clear performance expectations in each employee/manager relationship Pathways for advancement through more intentional professional development Documentation and rationale for succession plans Purpose: performance reviews will initiate dialogue between employees and their managers about expectations, performance, and professional development 16 Appreciating that some departments have developed “homegrown” processes, we are focused supporting departments with no existing review process Some non-union, not all, already receive a review
Department category
All non-union already receive a review No review process currently exists Count 26 Examples (not exhaustive)
Office of Equity and Inclusion
Inspectional Services
Human Services
Public Works
Community Development
B C A HR-supported, central review process 17 Working with these departments, we identified 106 colleagues that will get a review this year through HR’s central process 9 13 21 10 22-CityView
Animal Commission
Arts Council
Capital Building Projects
Strategy
Equity and Inclusion
City Manager’s Office
Communications
Community Development
Community Safety
Election Commission
Emergency Communications
Finance Fire
Historical Commission
Human Resources
Human Services
Information Technology
Inspectional Services
Law Library
License Commission
Peace Commission / PRAB
Police
Public Works
Traffic, Parking & Transportation