Asked the City Manager to confer with the City Solicitor's Office and provide an update on potential Surveillance Ordinance language

How it started

Feb 6, 2017 · Proposed by Councillors Cheung and Simmons: a formal request from the Council to the administration.

What happened

Feb 6, 2017 · Amendment carried Moved by Councillor Leland Cheung; carried on a voice vote.

the aforementioned order by adding at the end thereof the words "within two months

The clerk's words, from the minutes of Feb 6, 2017, p. 17.

Feb 6, 2017 · ✅ Order adopted as amended. The Council's request went to the City Manager.

View the roll call

Present and voting at this meeting (9)

Craig A. Kelley
David Maher
Dennis Carlone
E. Denise Simmons
Jan Devereux
Leland Cheung
Marc McGovern
Nadeem Mazen
Timothy J. Toomey

Adopted by voice vote. A voice vote records the outcome, not individual positions. No member's yes or no is on the record (though a member can ask to be recorded in the negative in the minutes). Showing the members who cast recorded votes at this meeting. Rule 6 requires a roll call for spending over $50 or on any member's request; state law requires one for every vote when a member participates remotely. · photos: City of Cambridge

What’s next

📨 Answered: the report came back as CMA 2017 #116 (Apr 24, 2017).

The document a council order

🏛 This item on the city's site 📄 Download original PDF

City of Cambridge

IN CITY COUNCIL

February 6, 2017

ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the City Solicitor’s office and update the City Council on the vetting process.

🗓 The meeting where this was taken up: Feb 6, 2017