🏛 The Cambridge Record
Agenda Items ▸ Policy Orders

POR 2017-38

Asked the City Manager to confer with the City Solicitor's Office and provide an update on potential Surveillance …

How it started
Proposed by Councillors Cheung and Simmons — a formal request from the Council to the administration.
What happened
✅ Order adopted — the Council's request now goes to the City Manager. (Order adopted as amended · Feb 6, 2017)

Present and voting at this meeting (9)

  • Craig A. Kelley
  • David Maher
  • Dennis Carlone
  • E. Denise Simmons
  • Jan Devereux
  • Leland Cheung
  • Marc McGovern
  • Nadeem Mazen
  • Timothy J. Toomey
Adopted by voice vote. A voice vote records the outcome, not individual positions — no member's yes or no is on the record (though a member can ask to be recorded in the negative in the minutes). Showing the members who cast recorded votes at this meeting. Rule 6 requires a roll call for spending over $50 or on any member's request; state law requires one for every vote when a member participates remotely. · photos: City of Cambridge
What’s next
📨 Answered — the report came back as CMA 2017 #116 (Apr 24, 2017).
🔍 Audit this page against the city's record — five checks, ~10 minutes; two independent audits mark it verified. How auditing works
Order adopted as amendedFeb 6, 2017
Referred for reportAR 2017-15Feb 13, 2017
Administration answeredCMA 2017-116Apr 24, 2017 · answered in 70 days

The item's path through the council — every recorded step. How the request pipeline works

The document a council order
🏛 View city website📄 Download original PDF
City of Cambridge
IN CITY COUNCIL
February 6, 2017

ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the City Solicitor’s office and update the City Council on the vetting process.