David Clem

1 term, 1976-77.

130papers filed100vs their councils100 = the median member158roll calls on record113roll-call events while seated88.5% of 94 rolls that name who was missingrecorded absent100votes recorded8of 81 votes on rolls that name each sideagainst the majority

Counts are what the record holds, not what happened: coverage thins the further back you look, and a term with little recovered will show small numbers for everyone who sat in it. The index is the figure to compare between people. It measures this councillor against the others on their own council, so the same gaps sit in the numerator and the denominator and largely cancel. Where this comes from.

Term by term

Term	Role	Papers	Index	Roll calls	Votes	Against
1976–77	Councillor	130	100	158	100	8

Who they voted with

Rated on contested roll calls only, the votes with at least one nay: the council adopts most business unanimously, and agreeing on a unanimous vote says nothing about affinity. Pairs sharing fewer than 10 contested votes are not rated. Agreement across all shared votes, unanimous included, is shown for context.

Most often

Councillor	Contested	Agreement	Overall
Barbara Ackermann	31 of 33	94%	98% of 93 votes
Francis Duehay	28 of 32	88%	96% of 95 votes
Saundra Graham	24 of 31	77%	92% of 85 votes

Least often

Councillor	Contested	Agreement	Overall
Walter Sullivan	7 of 30	23%	72% of 82 votes
Thomas Danehy	8 of 28	29%	73% of 75 votes
Daniel Clinton	10 of 33	30%	75% of 91 votes