TheCambridge Record
Agenda ItemsCity Manager's Agenda

CMA 2018-291

The Manager's report back on the possibility of installing a crosswalk at across Western Avenue at Soden Street

How it started
Nov 19, 2018 · Submitted by Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager: his response to the Council’s order about the possibility of installing a crosswalk at across Western Avenue at Soden Street (AR 18-90).
What happened
Nov 19, 2018 · ↪ Referred onward for further work (Referred back)
Referred backNov 19, 2018
Referred for reportAR 2018-90Oct 1, 2018
Administration answeredCMA 2018-291Nov 19, 2018 · answered in 49 days

The item's path through the council, every recorded step. How the request pipeline works

The document Agenda item attachment · 2 pages

Western Avenue was recently subject to a full reconstruction effort as part of a Department of Public Works’ capital project that established the new cycle track, improved sidewalks, and added new crosswalks at locations throughout the corridor between Central Square and Memorial Drive. That project resulted in the creation of a new crosswalk 200 feet to the west of Soden Street at Kinnaird Street (circled in green in the image below) as well as a significant reduction in the crossing length at the crosswalk 350 feet to the east at Pleasant Street (circled in blue in the image below).

Page 2 of 2 The majority of the pedestrian routes in the north-south direction are already served by the nearby crosswalk at Kinnaird Street and the estimated pedestrian demand for a crosswalk at this location is very low because Soden Street does not continue south of Western Avenue and there are limited retail land uses in the immediate area. The addition of a new crosswalk at Soden Street would also require the removal of a minimum of 2 parking spaces, as well as the reconstruction of the recently completed sidewalks in order to provide accessible sidewalk ramps. This intersection was also studied and discussed with the community as a potential crosswalk location during the Western Avenue reconstruction, and was not pursued further due to the low crossing demand and the parking loss. With these considerations in mind, we do not recommend installing a new crosswalk at this location.

🗓 The meeting where this was taken up: Nov 19, 2018

↩ Answers awaiting report: Awaiting report 2018 · #90