TheCambridge Record
Agenda ItemsPolicy Orders

POR 2017-69

Asked the City Manager to report back on how the City can mitigate the impact of work to the conduit property in Watertown and how it will be managed in the future, what efforts can be made to preserve the two mature trees that were marked but not removed, and how to involve the Watertown Tree Warden and Watertown Town Council in ensuring that Cambridge’s right to protect its water conduit is carried out while also preserving harmonious relations with the residents of Watertown

How it started
Mar 6, 2017 · Proposed by Vice Mayor Devereux and Councillor Kelley: a formal request from the Council to the administration.
What happened
Mar 6, 2017 · ✅ Order adopted. The Council's request went to the City Manager.

Present and voting at this meeting (9)

  • Craig A. Kelley
  • David Maher
  • Dennis Carlone
  • E. Denise Simmons
  • Jan Devereux
  • Leland Cheung
  • Marc McGovern
  • Nadeem Mazen
  • Timothy J. Toomey
Adopted by voice vote. A voice vote records the outcome, not individual positions. No member's yes or no is on the record (though a member can ask to be recorded in the negative in the minutes). Showing the members who cast recorded votes at this meeting. Rule 6 requires a roll call for spending over $50 or on any member's request; state law requires one for every vote when a member participates remotely. · photos: City of Cambridge
What’s next
No response on the docket: nothing has been filed back under this request's number (AR 2017 #25 open, 3,448 days). Answers sometimes arrive as other items; this ledger tracks only this one.
Order adoptedMar 6, 2017
Referred for reportAR 2017-25Mar 20, 2017
Awaiting answer⏳ pending3,448 days and counting

The item's path through the council, every recorded step. How the request pipeline works

🏛 This item on the city's site
🗓 The meeting where this was taken up: Mar 6, 2017